A Different Way to be Christian
Gnostic Christians



        Gnostic Christians believed that questioning one's faith was 

 important for it to change and grow. More than

             accepting a system of beliefs, the meaning of "gnosis" was

             "to know" Christ, and faith was led by seeking a vital,

             positive relationship with him.  Seeking "gnosis" led to 

             wholeness in a person's relationship to God 
and the world.
             Christ's way was a spiritual  journey, encouraging persons  

             continually to seek God and all truth. "Gnosis" did not mean 

             secret knowledge as opponents charged; new gospels

            (without belittling or replacing biblical gospels) teach it

            meant "knowing" Christ
 and God as one knows a friend. 
     In contrast to this dynamic way of faith, the early "apostolic 

    church," also known as the "proto - orthodox," declared its 

            beliefs and doctrines should never be questioned. Those who

    asked questions about these beliefs were not true Christians

    and were "heretics."  Three hundred years after the death and

            resurrection of Jesus, Constantine, for political reasons,

            sided with those who said only their understanding of Jesus

            was correct.  Faith became what one believed.

     Now we can learn those slandered as Gnostics believed

involved beliefs, but that all beliefs could be challenged,

     as faith was about our honest relationship and journey with

     the one they called the "living Jesus." 

Over the voices of those called Gnostics, Orthodox
             Christianity not only prevailed, but  it has continued

     ever since to define Christianity, foremost as a belief 

     system, dictated by doctrines.  The Gnostic scriptures show      
             that there was and is a more 
refreshing, spiritual, honest, open, 

     loving, and exciting way to be a Christian.


In 1945, new early gospels were discovered in Egypt. They are now commonly known now as the Gnostic Gospels. They were called Gnostic because some early Christians called Gnostics valued them. Scholarly research has affirmed they would have been read along with those in the Bible in early Christianity. What is rather shocking is they give evidence that some of the other of Jesus' disciples than those in the Bible also had gospels attributed to them.

Now that these gospels can be read again, it is rather surprising that they may have value for refreshing Christian faith today. Very few are saying that they are alternates to the gospels in the Bible but rather they supplement, not supplant them. Many believe they add to the spiritual vision of the Bible and refocus the emphasis of Christianity on faith rather than on necessary beliefs. Thus it is that Elaine Pagels who wrote the revolutionary book
The Gnostic Gospels says, "these remarkable texts are transforming what we know as Christianity."

Most of us have had very little knowledge that other gospels could have existed. There is a reason. Early in the development of Christianity, one form of the Christian church decided they should be silenced and eventually gave the order that they be destroyed. Unbelievably, it was decided they shouldn't even be heard. One major factor was they reveal that even the earliest disciples and apostles had differences of
beliefs among themselves. This was not acceptable to this church that believed Christianity should be one voice. These gospels make it clear that these other disciples express a great faith in Jesus, even as Lord and Savior, but they did not conform with the beliefs of a church that was becoming quite powerful in the second century.

This church declared, as many after them, that there was only one true way for Christians to believe. This way was to believe the beliefs and doctrines that their church taught. They claimed their right to exclusive truth by saying their beliefs were exactly those of Jesus and the apostles, and then implied they were those of all the apostles. Yet, in spite of this claim, now it is known that the apostles Thomas, Philip, and Mary Magdalene had gospels attributed to them. Nevertheless, this church taught us these were false and had no Christian truth in them. When read now, it appears one reason this early church might not have appreciated them was because they did not support several holy beliefs of this church such as a virgin birth, a bodily resurrection, and only males should be priest.

Herein was the problem; to disagree with this church's beliefs made one a
false Christian, and the path to hell was led by those called "heretics." Today, heretic is not a very powerful word, but early on and throughout history it became a sword to silence any who would challenge the beliefs of this church. As with claiming the apostles' beliefs as their own, this church was brilliant and using the term heretic was not a mistake. "Heretic" is a word that means "choice." This church, almost unbelievably, insisted there was no need for choice! This included choosing to hear or read other gospels they disapproved. Why? All Christian truth was limited to four particular gospels; all others contained no truth at all. The Gnostics disagreed.  

The Gnostics were among many who were called heretics, but they bring new light to Christian faith. As heretics, they were fairly
unique as their challenge went beyond just disagreeing over beliefs and myths. Their beauty becomes that they recognized that the message and gift of Christ was more than ironclad beliefs -- even theirs -- which obviously often differed with the church. They believed ones faith in Christ allowed choice and included something more important. Faith was our knowing (gnosis) Christ, and this knowing superseded what one believed.

As will be learned, the church defined "
gnosis" as what one believed or the "knowledge of God." The Gnostics didn't deny this totally, but in their writings there is a much more dynamic meaning or dimension for the meaning of gnosis. As many words like "love" in the English language can have various meanings, so the word gnosis could have different meanings. Thus for the Gnostics, the most important dimension of the word was "knowing" -- as in a relationship. Thus faith was a "relationship" with the living Christ, and not just blindly accepting "on faith" what the church taught. Of course, the church also taught that faith was a relationship. Yet this relationship could not happen unless one "believed the correct beliefs" about Jesus. How serious was this? As a matter of record, one could not be baptized until the church's beliefs were believed and confessed. Faith became what one believed, and particularly, what one believed about Jesus!

Today, there are many who understandably want to put these Gnostic heretics in the same boat as the early church -- to find salvation you had to believe
their beliefs and myths. They want to define them particularly by their myths and portray them as a cult, and at best, maybe a church that just had different beliefs. Many still teach they were interested only in a secret gnosis (knowledge), which some describe as esoteric, exclusive, and thus secretive beliefs or pure mystical insights. With the discovery of these new gospels, there is a major change -- none are directly found! 

Yes, they do have myths in them that reflect the culture of their day, and these are of little value today, much like science is now challenging some of our myths. For example, one such long held modern myth has been the view of the world as a simple three story universe with heaven above, earth in the middle, and hell below, and this was the real design of the world. From it, heaven and hell were real material locations according to some theologies of damnation. Then in 1929, Edmund Hubble discovered what might be another galaxy; now the Hubble Telescope has proven there are over 125 billion galaxies out there. So where are heaven and hell located? Our thinking about this will be forced to change. Yet does this invalidate our faith? Likewise, it is hard to argue because the myths of the Gnostics are no longer valid, their faith was also invalid. Instead, what is discovered is that they had a faith that was open to change and new truths. In this light, because of these gospels, there is now a new story about the Gnostics. A
s will be learned that as many of us today, they were Christians who believed in Christ but in their way of faith, they were more seekers of all truth and God than believers in authoritarian answers.

Thus these Gnostic Gospels bring the surprising news that these so-called heretics may have something positive to contribute to Christianity, and particularly, how we embrace faith. What is evident from these gospels is their faith was more about relationships than telling everyone what they
had to believe. With this emphasis on relationships, their faith in Christ was dynamic, more spiritual, personal, and powerful. How powerful? If the gnostic way of faith had prevailed, there would be a different face on Christianity today. So what is the gnostic way of faith? 

The gnostic way of faith is about "knowing" Jesus and God as in a relationship. This relationship is free, open, creative, and not the same for all. One does not have to be told what to believe and even how to act. You can and should use your brain as well as your emotion as faith can grow and our beliefs can change. You have the ability to think for yourself and have the freedom to choose what is most loving. The gnostic style believes seeking God is more important than finding God by a certain dogma or belief. Faith is more spiritual than accepting any system of beliefs.

Thus this web site isn't about accepting Gnosticism or their beliefs or myths (yes, some are strange), but it is to affirm that we can be
inspired by the freedom found in these new gospels. Its purpose is to share an early and widespread style of Christian faith that those described as Gnostics heard Jesus teach. Silenced, condemned, and lost, this way of faith allows new knowledge, such as that which now comes from history and modern science, to inform our faith and change not only our beliefs, but how we are Christian in today's world. Instead of those with all the answers, our belief in Jesus is led by seeking all truth, with emotion and conviction, yet with the realization that in faith no one has the corner on truth. Truth becomes greater than all those who claim to know "the" truth. In short, the gnostic way of faith affirms we can agree to disagree, as many more are accepting today, because faith --not battling over our beliefs-- was the message of Jesus.

"What Follows" are Three Sections about this Different but Suppressed Kind of Faith  
(All are recommended but feel free to skip down, or if interested in a free Quarterly Newsletter go to the Contact Page)

Background to the Conflict between the early Church and those they denounced as Heretical and Mythical Gnostics

Within the development of the early church, then, as now, even sincere Christians did not believe the same. Yet as the church developed with a growing number of those called bishops, they were able to claim by political power and self-declared authority that there need not be conflict or difference of beliefs for Christians. Long before Constantine, in the second century, a hundred years after the death and resurrection of Jesus, what was first called the "apostolic church" boldly declared that only their beliefs were the eternal and the unquestionable spiritual truths. There was no need to question or differ from them. Their message was: 
Only their knowledge (gnosis) of Jesus and God was correct.

As a threat to this purity, the judgment on these who challenged some of the knowledge of the church came to be called "Gnostics,"and they were described as "know nothings," which was the intent of the name. Particularly, any belief that
differed, for example, belief in a spiritual resurrection rather than a bodily resurrection, was simply false and wrong. End of the story as the church knew the truth! So it is precisely why the Apostles' Creed teaches us this about resurrection today. Further in their writings, they literally and boldly then teach all the "truth" of the church was "immovable." By truth, they clearly meant it to be the beliefs and doctrines of their church alone; they need not be questioned. As so many churches after them, truth equaled only their answers and should be accepted "on faith."

The Gnostics begged to differ because they never said truth was a closed issue. As will be seen, they had some different beliefs and myths but never do they say that what they believed was final, unquestionable, and unchangeable truth. In this sense, they were ahead of the times (at least for those today who believe theological diversity is fair). Thus they become viable as an interesting new role model for Christians today because the message they support is: 

1. Indeed, our beliefs can change.
2. In regard to faith, we can differ in our beliefs.
3. All beliefs can be challenged. 
4. What is true for both the world and religion can be open to question.
5. Faith is more than what we believe or what church to which we belong.
6. Faith is a relationship led by our
gnosis (our knowing) the living Christ.

Thus, the Gnostics would argue that this early church got it wrong. What is
immovable in Christianity is not our beliefs -- but our faith! 

Unfortunately, the Gnostics have been defined mostly for what they believed, and generally, it was assumed that they simply had a different set of beliefs than the church. Now that these new gospels can speak for themselves, it will be seen there is more to their story. Totally shocking is that those called Gnostic were, at least, at first, members of the church. In their writings, bishops of the church wail against their participation, and yet, almost unbelievably, a gnostic leader was almost elected Pope after the death of Hyginus in 143 C.E. (that might have changed things). So effective was the cry "heretics," before the Gnostic Gospels were discovered in recent times, many believed they were not even Christians. Now these gospels, attributed to disciples as those in the Bible, show that they believed in Jesus, strongly, as
Lord and Savior, and that they are filled with many beautiful expressions of faith in Christ. That was not expected.

Space limits but here a few examples from these condemned gospels.

The Gospel of Thomas, verse 77 states:
"Jesus said, It is I who am the light which is above them all. From me did the all come forth. Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Life up a stone, and you will find me there."           

Verse 16 of the Gospel of Truth says,
"... the one who is addressed as the Savior, that being the work he is to preform for the redemption of those who are ignorant of the Father, while in the name of the gospel is the proclamation of hope, being discovered by those who search for him."  

The Gospel of Mary says in Verse 8: "The blessed one said, Peace be with you. Receive my peace unto yourselves. For the Son of Man is within you. Follow after him! Those who seek will find him."

Hopefully, a few are surprised at the depth and faithfulness of these verses, which only scratches the surface! Verses, such as these, are not usually what one hears are in these gospels. These are chosen, nonetheless, as examples lifting up a theme many have found in these gospels. In these, one can see how the concept of
seeking was essential to the faith of the Gnostics. Interestingly, seek and you will find is not a closed answer but a process -- a part of our faith journey. Yet it is undeniable that these verses express a belief and trust in Jesus, and that is also often not heard or known because before they were discovered, most expected they would only contain false beliefs and myths. 

To be clear, they do contain myths that most of us reject today (these will be discussed), but somewhat startling is that we also learn more about other apostles and the surprising first-hand evidence that they actually differ (oh no, how could that be) with the church on several doctrines and positions. For some specific examples: The Gospel of Philip raises questions about the virgin birth. (Is this a requirement for faith?) The Gospel of Truth and several others argue for a spiritual resurrection. In contrast, a church father wrote, "Anyone who denies the resurrection of the flesh is a heretic, not a Christian" (a clear example of the early demand for the necessary or correct belief). The Gospel of Mary Magdalene makes it clear that even all the disciples did not agree (she argues boldly with Peter) and gives support that women should be priest. 

From the writings of the early church, which are extant, there is no question they wanted all Christians to believe the same (as they did). It is also clear from the above examples that the Gnostics begged to differ, but the price they paid was to be vilified as mythical Christians and everything they believed was "myth." In time, it proved to be a great argument, as what was expected from these gospels were nothing more than myths. Unfortunately, they do contain elements of Greek myths and wild variations on the Genesis story of creation. Yet the question becomes, even if they were wrong about their myths, does this make these believers
false Christians? That is what the church called them!

An analogy might be if one today doesn't believe creation happened "literally" and "exactly" as told in Genesis, does such a belief also make one a
false Christian? Yet, like so often today, because they interpreted Genesis differently, and say not as a scientific textbook, they too were called unchristian and not true believers -- as if a literal belief was required for faith.

The shock of these gospels is that these Christians had a faith greater than their myths. Unfortunately, the image and understanding of these gospels has has been led by the traditional view of religion -- "this is what the Gnostics believed."  Most base this almost entirely on their myths and often their secret "gnosis" is made one and the same as their myths. Yet there is something more to these gospels than teaching us some secret gnosis and myths that no longer make sense. Thus, even if the fathers were absolutely correct, like calling them a dangerous cult and that these other gospels were simply full of lies (both now quite questionable), it is the Gnostics' way of faith, not just arguing what they believed, that brings fresh air for how we are Christians today.

These gospels do something dramatic and transforming for faith. They make us rethink the message of Jesus. If he wanted all to believe the same way, why didn't he set forth beliefs and doctrines in writings or dictate those himself? Yet a radical take from these gospels is that they make it exceeding clear that one form of Christianity won and established over others what were to become the correct or orthodox beliefs of the faith.

This was a
watershed for Christianity as the focus became on beliefs. With such need to be right and "the" orthodox, deep emotional battles over beliefs began in earnest. Christian wars were to come. Faith became particularly "our" beliefs, and it lasted long into history as evident in the major Protestant/Catholic divisions, which are now thankfully beginning to show signs of peace. The point is that somehow between Jesus and Christianity, too often, faith became defined by beliefs, what one's church believed, and particularly, what one believed about Jesus.  

Thus it seems natural that many want to just put the Gnostics as a part of this battle for beliefs, but their
beauty is that these gospels bring forth a different kind of faith than just establishing another belief system. To have beliefs is not wrong, and to argue our differences, is the cure for just believing anything. Believe anything? No, they would argue that is why we have the right and need to challenge each other.

Yet to insist that one's beliefs (as many still do today) are the only way to know God is -- arrogant judgment -- not faith, and the deeper power and love of Christ gets lost. Thus, their way of faith, not the beliefs of the Gnostics, reopens, incredibly, faith as a relationship with the one they often called both the
real and spiritual "living Christ." Indeed, because of hearsay, and a long and uninformed tradition, some still try to claim the Gnostics would be the last place one would hear that faith is more than what we believe. Yet, both directly and indirectly, this is what the Gnostics have to offer. Faith is foremost a living trust in a God who loves us, and the Gnostic Gospels give support to those who believe faith, not immovable beliefs, was the message of Jesus.  

(If interested in a free Newsletter go the Contact Page or please keep reading. There is also information on a book related to this web site below.)

Second, of three sections:      A Call to Refocus Faith by being Seekers

As said in the introduction, these gospels encourage a more dynamic, refreshing, open-minded, spiritual, loving, and exciting way to be a Christian. A different way of faith,
as some might assume from preconceptions about these gospels, doesn't mean some radical, secret, or cultic way to believe but refers to a dramatic shift in the focus of faith. This focus becomes a dynamic connection to a vital inner experience of God's spirit that Jesus says (in the Gospel of Thomas) is both "within us" and "beyond us." Christianity becomes not merely a collection of facts but an honest and open quest, as this gospels says, to "bring forth" Christ's spirit for both ourselves and the world. Together as a whole, the discovery of these new early gospels puts more emphasis on "how" we believe. 

The "how" is about our personal relationship with the one these gospels refer to as both the "living Jesus" and the "living Christ." They lift up the same Jesus as found in the New Testament gospels (another shock), but more than beliefs about him is building our own vital, spiritual relationship with him.
Thus gnosis meant our knowing Christ -- as one knows a friend! This makes a huge and positive difference.

Of course, the church didn't understand gnosis this way, as for them it meant ones "knowledge" of God. Thus because gospels attributed to Thomas, Philip, and Mary Magdalene taught the "false" knowledge of God, they need not be read. With the charge of being false gospels, it is natural to just say these were then latter gospels. Although not the only reason scholars refute this, here is the clinger. Early bishops and church fathers refer to these gospels and mention some of them by name in their writings! Some have been carbon dated as being early gospels as well. Thus most believe they would have been read alongside the biblical gospels. With the discovery of these written gospels, the evidence becomes that one hundred years after the life of Jesus, those in power in the church decided for Jesus (and us) that these gospels were worthless. And those who read them were "Gnostics" because their gnosis was erroneous.

So in a sense, this is how the name "Gnostic Gospels" came to be; it was because these Christians appreciated them. And because these gospels contained elements of the Gnostic myths, it was convenient for the church to dismiss them as Gnostic Gospels. Yet now that we know these gospels contained expressions of faith beyond these myths, it can be argued a better name would have been "other" early gospels and writings (actually, there are only a few gospels and many more writings in the collection known as the Gnostic Gospels).

Nevertheless, labeling one's enemy has been helpful in vilifying those we oppose, and in this case, calling all the books "Gnostic," was quite effective. In essence, the church shut the door on truth by limiting Jesus' message to only what they believed, and then by doing so, the way of knowing Jesus and God as one knows a friend (as can be discovered in these gospels) got covered up. And if that wasn't enough, the church quite successfully taught that their gnosis  was "secret knowledge." Of course, this made them to be like a cult, or those who were better than others (as if the church was not), or those who claimed to know the deep, dark secrets of God that only a few knew. 

This is what is quite surprising in these books. No block of "secret knowledge" is found in these gospels! The secret seems to be that we can know the living Christ in different ways and not just the way dictated by the church. It is true that these gospels are often titled secret, e.g.,  the "Secret Gospel of Thomas." Yet no one is for sure why they are called "secret." They may have been described such because they were deemed forbidden writings. Some put them as "advanced" or special teachings akin to when Jesus in the Bible (in Matthew and Mark) draws some disciples away and gives them special or --secret -- teachings. Thus it is quite common today to associate the word gnosis as meaning some kind of secret wisdom or some very deep spiritual insights, as they do stress the spiritual over the religious. Yet what is really stressed is that faith is "Beyond Belief" -- the title of one of Elaine Pagels' books. Thus some might hope (and even try to teach) that these books can tell us the secrets of what is beyond belief, but to the disdain of those who believe gnosis means secret knowledge, these gospels do not tell us what these insights or wisdom might be.  

Yet this is what the church wanted people to believe about the Gnostics because it made it appear that they, as opposed to the wisdom of the church, were those who just "thought" they knew the secrets of the divine and the cosmos. Now it is clear from these gospels that this was an effective tool to slander them as heretical "know--it --alls," and it worked well; it also becomes clear now from these gospels -- they did not!

In no way do these gospels (or the Gnostics) have all the answers. In fact, these gospels, which supplement, not supplant, the biblical gospels, are for the most part inferior to them, but they are powerful in the sense that they unlock that faith is limited to those who tell us that which we must believe -- or else! Rather, they recapture what some of us believe reflects the deeper message of Jesus. Faith becomes being on a journey to seek our positive relationship (gnosis) with God through Christ and his living spirit. Interestingly, then, our spiritual life is something we experience now and is not just another world that comes only when we die. The spirit of Christ is with us now!   
The Gnostic Gospels were unexpectedly discovered in Egypt in 1945. To be clear, their discovery was two years before that of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which absolutely contained no gospels. Yet they are often confused with the Scrolls, and many Christians don't realized their separate importance. This was a different discovery in Egypt, and it contained news that many Christians didn't want to hear -- there were other early gospels. So even if there were other gospels what difference does this make for Christianity? 

This is what changes. Until the discovery of other early gospels, the way to be Christian was simply "to believe." This Orthodox or Fundamentalist interpretation of Christ made Christianity another religion -- to oppose others.  "Believe in Christ as we do or go to hell."  "The only way to know God is limited to our chosen books."  "Obey and believe the beliefs and rules of our church -- and its God given authority."  In doing so, you would receive the gift of salvation. This was the orthodox message from Jesus -- to be a "believer."

In contrast, and in summary: The Gnostics were "seekers." It was far more important to seek God through all kinds of knowledge rather than "just believe." They were believers in Christ, but they heard a different message from Jesus. They had beliefs, as we all do, but they did not insist they had the corner on -- or final -- truth in interpreting the world or God. Christ's message was more spiritual than religious -- not bearing all the answers.

The place to find God was within oneself, not in externals like beliefs, dogma, or dictates of the church. Their interpretation was that we could experience the living Christ and God, by seeking, not finalizing God. Your faith is not what you believe about Christ but your relationship with Him, and this relationship affected your positive relationship with yourself and others. Thus an important point needs to be added. Contrary to what one might expect, they actually wanted to be a part of the church, for its fellowships and relationships, but as one scholar said "the church kicked them out" because there was no room for heretics and especially these wrong "headed" Christians.

For them, gnosis meant more than head-type knowledge (that could change as it does with time), but knowing Jesus and God as you know another person. As faith is a two way relationship, it is also essential to know yourself and be touched by what the
Gospel of Philip calls the transforming power of "love and light." Seeking God and this relationship, because of Christ and his messages, both in his words and in his actions from the cross (which they interestingly called a living book), was the true act of faith. That is the gnostic style and spirit found in the exciting materials often called, the Gnostic Gospels!

(Third Section) :

This Site is about being Inspired by the Gnostics, not becoming Gnostics

  (Information on a related book and the Newsletter is below)

 International Dateline     Scott Angus




        Gnosticschristians.com is a web site
for those who are interested in learning
about a different way to be Christian that was literally suppressed because it held that Jesus' message was more spiritual than establishing a set of required beliefs about him.   
This different way to believe is inspired by those we now know as GNOSTICS --pronounced "Naw-stics." Surprisingly, at least, at first, the Gnostics were actually 
 members of early Christian churches and not an organized denomination or even a church unto themselves. They were a fairly diverse group of the earliest Christians, who accepted the gospels that would become biblical, but also they were those who found value in other gospels. This was not acceptable to one form of the church led by bishops who declared any gospels that did not directly support their beliefs were false. Around 200 C.E., Bishop Irenaeus insisted there were only four true gospels, and all others were worthless. This little known Bishop became extremely powerful in silencing other gospels and declaring only the beliefs of his church were precisely those of Jesus. Almost single-handily in his Against Heresies, he established it was a sin and "heretical" to question any of the church's teachings.

In contrast, those vilified as Gnostics (a term they did
not call themselves but was what the bishops called them), believed other early disciples of Christ should be heard and also that Jesus' message was more than establishing hard-core beliefs. Further, as they believed that Christian beliefs could be open to change, particularly with new knowledge, they were seen as a threat to "true" Christianity. This judgment was made primarily by bishops who were organizing themselves as the "apostolic church." Only the beliefs of this church were true because they were exactly those of the apostles. Who better could know the truth? Now it is known that some apostles like Mary Magdalene, Philip, and Thomas were overlooked, but it was established that to believe the truths of their church (and those apostles with whom they agreed) was the way to be Christian. Today, the Gnostics expand the way to be Christian, and almost ironically against their portrayal and image in history, they can inspire us to be Christians who are free to seek and learn new truths, and by our faith always seek our vital and honest relationship through him with God.   
Gnostics were given the severest of attacks among the heretics, because as members of the church, they were like a cancer within. Nevertheless, they have been portrayed as not even being Christians, believed only in myths (as if the apostolic church had none), and that Jesus wasn't a real person. Now that these gospels can speak for themselves, such charges are not that simple, and there is a new story and evidence about their strong faith and belief in a real Jesus. In spite of their faith in him as Savior, the elimination of writings judged "heretical," "false," and "impure," was almost successful. But thanks to some monks, who most likely hid the forbidden works in a mountain cliff in Egypt, near a village called Nag Hammadi, the Gnostic Gospels and writings can now speak for themselves.

In 1945, fifty-two texts (including such titles as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth) were found in Egypt at the base of a high mountain ridge having at least 150 caves. Interestingly, a farmer named Muhammad Ali (al-Samman), looking for softer soil for fertilizer in the talus below one of the caves, found a large jar filled with thirteen books written on papyrus, bound in leather. Muhammad's mother actually burned some pages to kindle a fire, but thankfully, he decided to take them to an antiquities dealer. As had long been rumored, we now know indeed there were other Christian gospels written as well as those in the Bible in the early development of Christianity. Careful research has declared them authentic. Finally, after fifty years of study and translation by scholars, they are available to the general public. They raise questions, which have the potential to free Christianity from centuries of simple answers, and for many, unacceptable positions and beliefs, allowing all truth to be a part of the process of faith.   

       Are you a person who thinks, beyond the twenty-seven books in the New        Testament, chosen by early Bishops, that other gospels and writings written  in the same time period, ought to be heard?  

Are you one who questions certain beliefs or "articles" of faith in the       Apostles' Creed, such as the virgin birth or a bodily resurrection? 

 Are you one who thinks religions other than Christianity may have validity?

Do you believe women have the right to be clergy? 

 Are you one who thinks your own relationship with God and Christ is more  important than what a church tells you must believe?

Is your style of faith honestly seeking what is true about the world and God  rather than blind belief? 

If you answered "yes" to most of these questions, you could be interested in learning more about these powerful early Christian resources that were suppressed until 1945.
   (These manuscripts now can be purchased in several translations including  a paperback collection called, The Nag Hammadi Library in English, edited by James M. Robinson.)  


To register yourself as one who believes, seeking God, is more important than finding God by a certain dogma or belief, go to the "contact us" icon (top of this page), where you can make comment and may sign on for the Seeking Christians Newsletter. This seeking way of faith is also expounded in other files accessed above.

Although it is not essential to sign on, many have also found the book described next, as very inspiring and helpful -- see the reviews at amazonbooks.com.

                  "Christ's Way Was A Spiritual Journey"

     The Outback Journey--Australia       Scott Angus          

Information on the
Award Winning Book related to this Web Site! 

The Hidden Messages of Jesus: How the Gnostic Gospels Change Christianity
by Larry A. Angus, was first published in April 2012. It won the nationally respected CIPA (Colorado Independent Publishers Association)
2014 Merit Award in the category Spirituality/Religion. It also won the Reader's Favorite Five Star Award.

Although intended for a general audience, the book gives
footnotes and much scholarly ground for the validity of the information presented in this web site. It is built on years of research.

Cost is $16, but less at amazonbooks, etc. Available as an e-book, the cost is $6.95.  
A picture of both the book and author are below.    

Why Consider the Book?    In the book, you will learn much about the Gnostic Gospels, how and why they were ordered destroyed, who the Gnostics were, and why they were considered heretics. By demonizing them, facts are given how Bishop Irenaeus and Constantine together, but separately, decided what true Christians had to believe, and how this laid the groundwork for many battles and even wars, not for faith, but for Christian beliefs. 
Not just presenting facts, the book shows why the new understanding can inspire us today. There is the revelation that these new gospels bring the unexpected news that there were early Christians who were not locked into narrow and absolute beliefs and myths. Instead, they surprisingly teach that  "
gnosis" for them meant one's relationship--as in knowing another, especially Christ and God--not some secret knowledge! 
This knowing was led by searching for the truth--not declaring it as so many have done, including bishops in the early church, who literally put in writing that
only they knew the truth of God.  Gnostic Christians, in contrast, believed faith was not a closed system of beliefs but foremost a spiritual journey.

To be clear, the book isn't about making one a Gnostic or promoting Gnostic Churches (there are a few who call themselves Gnostics)--it is about what might be called developing or affirming a "gnostic way of faith." I myself do not identify my self as a "Gnostic Christian."

Rather, it is about how these hidden gospels can
inspire Christians, in your own church, or for those of you may have left certain churches, to be, as the Gnostics tried to be, honest, open, loving, seekers of God. Thus I call myself a "Seeking Christian," but you my want your own terminology. For more information, open the tabs at the top of this page. I really appreciate those who make comments and try to respond to those who do so at the Contact Page.  

Thanks!  Rev. Larry Angus     (Biography information is in the next file)

 (Sorry for the inconvenience, you must scroll to the  top for other files.)

Website Builder